In a split decision by the U.S. Supreme Court decided February 22, 2023, Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. et al. v. Hewitt, an oil rig supervisor earning over $200,000 per year sued for overtime. Hewitt typically worked 84 hours per week on the offshore drilling vessel and was paid a flat daily rate and then had 28 days off before returning to the vessel. Hewitt filed an action against Helix seeking overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which guarantees overtime pay to covered employees when they work more than 40 hours a week. Helix defended on the grounds that Hewitt was a highly compensated, exempt, executive employee.
Under applicable regulations, an employee is considered a bona fide executive excluded from the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) protections if the employee meets three distinct tests:
The Secretary of Labor has implemented the bona fide executive standard through two separate and slightly different rules, one “general rule” applying to employees making less than $100,000 in annual compensation, and a different rule addressing “highly compensated employees” (HCEs) who make at least $100,000 per year. 29 CFR §§541.100, 541.601(a), (b)(1). The primary dispute was whether Hewitt met the requirement under Department of Labor regulations of being paid on a salary basis. The Supreme Court determined that Hewitt did not meet the salary basis requirements of § 541.602(a) merely because he always received more than the required minimum salary amount on his biweekly paychecks.
An employer should be able to demonstrate compliance with every single element of an FLSA exemption exactly as set forth in the regulations, so OutSolve clients should review their compensation structures for exempt employees carefully to ensure the salary basis and duties tests are met for highly compensated employees.
For more information on compensation compliance, contact OutSolve today.